Compare and Contrast the Personality Theories of Freud and Eysenck

Introduction: This report rotates around the two great names of psychologythat are Sigmund Freud and Hans J. Eysenck. These two have given their entire life to the field and have contributed a lot when it comes to psychology development. Through this unit the learners will get to know about the work these two have done for the development of psychology.

Freud’s concept of character became specifically laid low with 3 factors of thoughts referred to as the id, ego and superego, prompted via way of means of the subconscious thoughts and managed via way of means of pleasures, sexual dreams and aggression; Eysenck’s concept on the alternative hand, became evolved via way of means of 3 dimensional concept of character being neuroticism, extraversion and psychoticism (Cooper, 2010). Freud believed that the character evolved thru early life inside 5 levels (taken into consideration levels of pleasure) that are the oral, anal, phallic, latent and genital levels and distortion in any of those levels could have an effect on the character of the person (Laureate, 2015). For Eysenck, Freud became a exceptional tale teller whose theories lacked clinical evidence (Eysenck 2004). He even vigorously criticized psychotherapy due to the fact he believed that most effective scientifically studied strategies are deemed to offer correct know-how of human conduct with records being vital in validating character elements (Eysenck 1994). This is of direction questionable as there are numerous different methods to keep in mind a look at clinical apart from the usage of statistical equipment and thing evaluation in unique. Compared to Freud, Eysenck’s 3 dimensional concept of character became extra clinical together along with his Personality Questionnaire being supported till date via way of means of numerous areas, as like body structure and character genetics (Beratis, Rabavilas, Papadimitriou, & Papageorgiou, 2011). As a behaviorist, he became substantially inquisitive about temperament (Zuckerman, & Cloninger, 1996) and as a studies psychologist, he implicated the ‘thing evaluation’ approach in his studies strategies and determined major elements of temperament being neuroticism and extraversion-introversion (Copper (2010). In assessment to Freud who formulated his concept via way of means of reading a completely small facts (his sufferers specifically), Eysenck now no longer most effective used a huge facts inside his studies however additionally found out that he became nevertheless now no longer masking all population, thus, moved his research to the intellectual establishments in England. By most effective studying even a more facts that he located the 0.33 thing, the psychoticism (Boeree, 2006). Eysenck’s believed that that each one 3 bipolar dimensions, neuroticism, extraversion and psychoticism have been innate while Freud believed that anything a baby experiments throughout his developmental levels could make a contribution to the character he’d be forming in his adulthood (Cooper, 2010). Eysenck’s concept and outline of humans and the variations of their character appears to be supported, however, it does now no longer give an explanation for why humans carry out higher than others or how a few humans should deliver interest to unique problems and others don’t (Matthews and Gilliland, 1999).

It’s actual that Freud and Eysenck contributed substantially to the improvement of character theories and as a great deal as genetics have an effect on the improvement of character, so does experience, reminiscences and or occurrence from one’s early life (Cooper 2010), however the reality that Freud’s theories have been now no longer primarily based totally on clinical facts, weakens his role and therefore, Eysenck theories appear to be dependable and having clinical affect over the improvement of character psychology. However, I accept as true with that each theorist brought something to the character psychology, be it trait approach, biological, genetic, behavioral, social, or cognitive and character can most effective be absolutely understood if all of the techniques come together.